🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a prohibition on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a latest court ruling.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on Tuesday that it would reexamine the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an expanded group of 11 judges. The court also overturned a earlier ruling from a three-judge panel that had supported the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the most recent development in a protracted court case over whether the administration has the authority and justification to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in uncertainty since the end of September when the deployment effort was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has argued that federal officials at the ICE facility in south Portland were facing threats, while city and state officials maintain that municipal police have command of the circumstances.

Contrary to descriptions of Portland as “war ravaged”, locals have been sharing videos of lush hiking trails and a thriving food scene, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the increased military presence.

Court Proceedings

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in Portland enacted two legal injunctions this month – one preventing the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the use of any military personnel in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing troops from California.

On Monday, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – allowing control of state troops – but the subsequent injunction stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the matter will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under review together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This decision demonstrates that the truth matters and that the judicial system are working to ensure government responsibility. The founding document limits the executive authority, and local populations cannot be treated as a testing site for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the president cannot dispatch the armed forces into US cities without cause. We will continue defending state legislation, values, and sovereignty as this legal proceeding progresses and our fight continues in the judicial system.”